Added alphabet check before decoding #7

오픈
Ghost "(deleted):master 에서 master 로 3 commits 를 머지하려 합니다"
First-time contributor

Resolves #6

Linear time complexity solution, guaranteed to work.

Alternatively you could check the expected length of the output matches but then you will have to deal with edge cases (such as the test case given).

Resolves #6 Linear time complexity solution, guaranteed to work. Alternatively you could check the expected length of the output matches but then you will have to deal with edge cases (such as the test case given).
Ghost added 1 commit 2021-03-04 05:12:50 +00:00
소유자

I'm open to updating this, but it's so old an relied on so heavily by so many projects and devices (including the AppleTV SDK) that I think I'll have to do a major version bump even for a bugfix.

You could actually make this quite a bit faster by checking character ranges.

// off the cuff, not correct code
if (!(x >= "a".toCharCode() && x <= "Z".toCharCode() /* && range of symbols*/)) {
   throw Error('barf');
}

Also, I want to stick with Vanilla JavaScript (ES5) so that, for those who update, they don't have to introduce a compiler or change their other build tools.

I'm open to updating this, but it's so old an relied on so heavily by so many projects and devices (including the AppleTV SDK) that I think I'll have to do a major version bump even for a bugfix. You could actually make this quite a bit faster by checking character ranges. ```js // off the cuff, not correct code if (!(x >= "a".toCharCode() && x <= "Z".toCharCode() /* && range of symbols*/)) { throw Error('barf'); } ``` Also, I want to stick with Vanilla JavaScript (ES5) so that, for those who update, they don't have to introduce a compiler or change their other build tools.
Ghost added 1 commit 2021-03-11 13:26:24 +00:00
Ghost added 1 commit 2021-03-11 13:27:27 +00:00
Author
First-time contributor

I changed it to a range check (good advice).

I think I've changed it to ES5, but I'm not super familiar with what is ES5 and what came after so I could have missed things.

We use a package called localflare to run Cloudflare Workers for testing which depends on this package. I discovered the different behavior between atob and buffer when looking at b64url in our code.

For us making the change is beneficial because the closer we can get our environment to Cloudflare the better (and I'm really against Node's behavior on this) but I also understand being cautious about versioning. I'll just have to make a PR to localflare to update their version :)

(Wrangler is on our roadmap but it will be a little while before we get there)

I changed it to a range check (good advice). I think I've changed it to ES5, but I'm not super familiar with what is ES5 and what came after so I could have missed things. We use a package called localflare to run Cloudflare Workers for testing which depends on this package. I discovered the different behavior between `atob` and `buffer` when looking at b64url in our code. For us making the change is beneficial because the closer we can get our environment to Cloudflare the better (and I'm really against Node's behavior on this) but I also understand being cautious about versioning. I'll just have to make a PR to localflare to update their version :) (Wrangler is on our roadmap but it will be a little while before we get there)
소유자

Thanks.
I've scheduled review, update, merge, and publish this on Saturday.

Thanks. I've scheduled review, update, merge, and publish this on Saturday.
This pull request is broken due to missing fork information.
"로그인하여 이 대화에 참여"
No reviewers
레이블 없음
마일스톤 없음
담당자 없음
참여자 2명
알림
마감일
기한이 올바르지 않거나 범위를 벗어났습니다. 'yyyy-mm-dd'형식을 사용해주십시오.

마감일이 설정되지 않았습니다.

의존성

No dependencies set.

Reference: coolaj86/atob.js#7
No description provided.