serviceman remove #3

New Issue

ryanburnette · 2019-07-11T13:06:36Z

ryanburnette commented

2019-07-11 13:06:36 +00:00

serviceman remove might also be nice to have.

This SuperUser post gives a good recipe for removal that can both be used in the interim and as a template for the removal process that will be added.

systemctl stop [servicename]
systemctl disable [servicename]
rm /etc/systemd/system/[servicename]
rm /etc/systemd/system/[servicename] symlinks that might be related
systemctl daemon-reload
systemctl reset-failed

It would also be good for serviceman remove and serviceman rm to both work for the value of being intuitive.

`serviceman remove` might also be nice to have. [This SuperUser post](https://superuser.com/a/936976) gives a good recipe for removal that can both be used in the interim and as a template for the removal process that will be added. ``` systemctl stop [servicename] systemctl disable [servicename] rm /etc/systemd/system/[servicename] rm /etc/systemd/system/[servicename] symlinks that might be related systemctl daemon-reload systemctl reset-failed ``` It would also be good for `serviceman remove` and `serviceman rm` to both work for the value of being intuitive.

coolaj86 commented

2019-07-14 05:13:08 +00:00

Agreed. And it wouldn't be difficult. I think you should take this on yourself after we work on the other one together.

ryanburnette commented

2019-07-16 14:03:54 +00:00

Sounds good.

ryanburnette changed title from ~~Feature Request remove~~ to serviceman remove

2021-02-15 23:18:44 +00:00

Sign in to join this conversation.

No Label

No Milestone

No Assignees

2 Participants

Notifications

Due Date

The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: coolaj86/go-serviceman#3