redundant Promise.then usage #14

Neues Issue

Ghost · 2018-07-27T23:03:36Z

Ghost hat

2018-07-27 23:03:36 +00:00

kommentiert

https://git.coolaj86.com/coolaj86/greenlock.js/src/branch/master/lib/core.js#L439

Doing

promise.then(function (results) {
  return results;
})

Is redundant, without that clause the promise will already resolve to results.

https://git.coolaj86.com/coolaj86/greenlock.js/src/branch/master/lib/core.js#L439 Doing ``` promise.then(function (results) { return results; }) ``` Is redundant, without that clause the promise will already resolve to `results`.

coolaj86 hat

2018-08-18 10:15:53 +00:00

kommentiert

Besitzer

Correct, this is safe to remove.

It's probably leftover from some debugging or a transformation of data, or a control flow branch that was removed.

I'll leave this open to remind me to take care of that.

Correct, this is safe to remove. It's probably leftover from some debugging or a transformation of data, or a control flow branch that was removed. I'll leave this open to remind me to take care of that.

Ghost hat

2018-10-26 08:27:05 +00:00

kommentiert

Autor

AJ - do you have any objections to adding jest in for unit testing? I know this is a trivial change but that makes it useful for proving test automation.

Your hand rolled test code keeps things simple but I appreciate the extra info that using a framework provides.

AJ - do you have any objections to adding jest in for unit testing? I know this is a trivial change but that makes it useful for proving test automation. Your hand rolled test code keeps things simple but I appreciate the extra info that using a framework provides.

Ghost hat

2018-10-26 08:29:45 +00:00

kommentiert

Autor

(btw - what the target minimum node level? I am working with 8 but tend to babel compile from 7+.)

Happy to create a pull request for this one, with or without jest

(btw - what the target minimum node level? I am working with 8 but tend to babel compile from 7+.) Happy to create a pull request for this one, with or without jest

coolaj86 hat

2018-10-26 22:22:58 +00:00

kommentiert

Besitzer

No objections.

coolaj86 hat

2018-10-26 22:39:56 +00:00

kommentiert

Besitzer

Thank you, btw.

Ghost hat

2018-11-05 11:21:02 +00:00

kommentiert

Autor

Sorry about delay - I got stuck trying to wire a test around it. Not sure how to best test? Do you generally point it at the sandbox on an internet IP for testing?

coolaj86 hat

2018-11-06 08:16:51 +00:00

kommentiert

Besitzer

@chanoch Yes. I create a temporary digital ocean vps and point four test domains at it and run through a few different scenarios.

Then I deploy it to git.coolaj86.com and a possibly a few other sites to see if it works in my existing setups as well.

@chanoch Yes. I create a temporary digital ocean vps and point four test domains at it and run through a few different scenarios. Then I deploy it to git.coolaj86.com and a possibly a few other sites to see if it works in my existing setups as well.

coolaj86 hat diesen Issue

2019-02-05 05:15:18 +00:00

geschlossen

Anmelden, um an der Diskussion teilzunehmen.

Kein Label

Kein Meilenstein

Niemand zuständig

2 Beteiligte

Nachrichten

Fällig am

Das Fälligkeitsdatum ist ungültig oder außerhalb des zulässigen Bereichs. Bitte verwende das Format „jjjj-mm-tt“.

Kein Fälligkeitsdatum gesetzt.

Abhängigkeiten

Keine Abhängigkeiten gesetzt.

Referenz: coolaj86/greenlock.js-ARCHIVED#14