redundant Promise.then usage #14

Questão nova

Ghost · 2018-07-27T23:03:36Z

Ghost comentou

2018-07-27 23:03:36 +00:00

https://git.coolaj86.com/coolaj86/greenlock.js/src/branch/master/lib/core.js#L439

Doing

promise.then(function (results) {
  return results;
})

Is redundant, without that clause the promise will already resolve to results.

https://git.coolaj86.com/coolaj86/greenlock.js/src/branch/master/lib/core.js#L439 Doing ``` promise.then(function (results) { return results; }) ``` Is redundant, without that clause the promise will already resolve to `results`.

coolaj86 comentou

2018-08-18 10:15:53 +00:00

Proprietário(a)

Correct, this is safe to remove.

It's probably leftover from some debugging or a transformation of data, or a control flow branch that was removed.

I'll leave this open to remind me to take care of that.

Correct, this is safe to remove. It's probably leftover from some debugging or a transformation of data, or a control flow branch that was removed. I'll leave this open to remind me to take care of that.

Ghost comentou

2018-10-26 08:27:05 +00:00

Autor(a)

AJ - do you have any objections to adding jest in for unit testing? I know this is a trivial change but that makes it useful for proving test automation.

Your hand rolled test code keeps things simple but I appreciate the extra info that using a framework provides.

AJ - do you have any objections to adding jest in for unit testing? I know this is a trivial change but that makes it useful for proving test automation. Your hand rolled test code keeps things simple but I appreciate the extra info that using a framework provides.

Ghost comentou

2018-10-26 08:29:45 +00:00

Autor(a)

(btw - what the target minimum node level? I am working with 8 but tend to babel compile from 7+.)

Happy to create a pull request for this one, with or without jest

(btw - what the target minimum node level? I am working with 8 but tend to babel compile from 7+.) Happy to create a pull request for this one, with or without jest

coolaj86 comentou

2018-10-26 22:22:58 +00:00

Proprietário(a)

No objections.

coolaj86 comentou

2018-10-26 22:39:56 +00:00

Proprietário(a)

Thank you, btw.

Ghost comentou

2018-11-05 11:21:02 +00:00

Autor(a)

Sorry about delay - I got stuck trying to wire a test around it. Not sure how to best test? Do you generally point it at the sandbox on an internet IP for testing?

coolaj86 comentou

2018-11-06 08:16:51 +00:00

Proprietário(a)

@chanoch Yes. I create a temporary digital ocean vps and point four test domains at it and run through a few different scenarios.

Then I deploy it to git.coolaj86.com and a possibly a few other sites to see if it works in my existing setups as well.

@chanoch Yes. I create a temporary digital ocean vps and point four test domains at it and run through a few different scenarios. Then I deploy it to git.coolaj86.com and a possibly a few other sites to see if it works in my existing setups as well.

coolaj86 encerrou esta questão

2019-02-05 05:15:18 +00:00

Inicie a sessão para participar neste diálogo.

Sem rótulo

Sem etapa

Sem encarregados

2 Participantes

Notificações

Data de vencimento

A data de vencimento é inválida ou está fora do intervalo permitido. Por favor, use o formato 'aaaa-mm-dd'.

Sem data de vencimento definida.

Dependências

Não estão definidas dependências.

Referência: coolaj86/greenlock.js-ARCHIVED#14