coolaj86/greenlock.js-ARCHIVED
3
3
Vork 0
Code Kwesties 6 Pull-aanvragen 1 Publicaties Activiteit

Consider monorepo / ECDSA Support #4

Nieuw probleem
Gesloten
2018-01-08 13:06:27 +00:00 geopend door Ghost · 4 opmerkingen
Ghost reageerde 2018-01-08 13:06:27 +00:00
Link kopiëren

Currently, the family of greenlock packages are split across a dozen or so repos across different git hosting sites, each at different version. Links in docs are also constantly being broken.

This makes it very difficult to track what versions are actually in use, and very difficult to contribute things requiring coordination between different greenlock packages.

Considering switching the whole family of packages to a monorepo. This has all the benefits of having independently versioned modules, while still allowing easy coordination between them. Links in docs can also be relative to the repo instead of absolute to a git hosting site, which is apparently subject to changes every once in a while.

(P.S. I'd like to contribute ECDSA support, but I'm having a very hard time tracking the lower layers of greenlock, and figuring our what to contribute where, so at this point, I've given up before I've even made an attempt... Switching to a monorepo would help me A LOT)

Currently, the family of greenlock packages are split across a dozen or so repos across different git hosting sites, each at different version. Links in docs are also constantly being broken. This makes it very difficult to track what versions are actually in use, and very difficult to contribute things requiring coordination between different greenlock packages. Considering switching the whole family of packages to a [monorepo](https://github.com/babel/babel/blob/master/doc/design/monorepo.md). This has all the benefits of having independently versioned modules, while still allowing easy coordination between them. Links in docs can also be relative to the repo instead of absolute to a git hosting site, which is apparently subject to changes every once in a while. (P.S. I'd like to contribute ECDSA support, but I'm having a very hard time tracking the lower layers of greenlock, and figuring our what to contribute where, so at this point, I've given up before I've even made an attempt... Switching to a monorepo would help me A LOT)
coolaj86 reageerde 2018-01-12 02:40:29 +00:00
Eigenaar
Link kopiëren

Yeah... this repo has been an unfortunate victim of a lot of political nonsense. :-/

I agree in theory with the monorepo and have considered the approach before. The only problem is that npm doesn't support git subtrees and they have no plans to support it.

I can help you add ECDSA support. I'd love that.

Yeah... this repo has been an unfortunate victim of a lot of political nonsense. :-/ I agree in theory with the monorepo and have considered the approach before. The only problem is that npm doesn't support git subtrees and they have no plans to support it. I can help you add ECDSA support. I'd love that.
coolaj86 reageerde 2018-01-12 02:47:00 +00:00
Eigenaar
Link kopiëren

ECDSA key support needs to happen around here:

https://git.coolaj86.com/coolaj86/le-acme-core.js/src/master/lib/register-new-account.js#L12

And here:

https://git.coolaj86.com/coolaj86/le-acme-core.js/src/master/lib/acme-client.js#L15

And here:

https://git.coolaj86.com/coolaj86/greenlock.js/src/master/lib/core.js#L15

And there would need to be some sort of new option here:

https://git.coolaj86.com/coolaj86/greenlock.js/src/master/lib/core.js#L49

ECDSA key support needs to happen around here: ~~https://git.coolaj86.com/coolaj86/le-acme-core.js/src/master/lib/register-new-account.js#L12~~ And here: ~~https://git.coolaj86.com/coolaj86/le-acme-core.js/src/master/lib/acme-client.js#L15~~ And here: https://git.coolaj86.com/coolaj86/greenlock.js/src/master/lib/core.js#L15 And there would need to be some sort of new option here: https://git.coolaj86.com/coolaj86/greenlock.js/src/master/lib/core.js#L49
coolaj86 titel aangepast van Consider monorepo approach naar Consider monorepo approach / ECDSA Support 2018-04-19 20:12:05 +00:00
coolaj86 titel aangepast van Consider monorepo approach / ECDSA Support naar Consider monorepo / ECDSA Support 2018-04-19 20:12:16 +00:00
coolaj86 reageerde 2018-04-19 20:14:14 +00:00
Eigenaar
Link kopiëren

I've updated the API library for Let's Encrypt v2 (aka ACME v2 aka ACME draft 11)

https://git.coolaj86.com/coolaj86/acme-v2.js

That's the first place to start to add ECDSA support.

I've updated the API library for Let's Encrypt v2 (aka ACME v2 aka ACME draft 11) https://git.coolaj86.com/coolaj86/acme-v2.js That's the first place to start to add ECDSA support.
coolaj86 reageerde 2018-05-18 08:19:13 +00:00
Eigenaar
Link kopiëren

Closing as the feature is being worked on in the aforementioned repo, but making a note to update for those following when it's released.

Closing as the feature is being worked on in the aforementioned repo, but making a note to update for those following when it's released.
coolaj86 heeft dit probleem gesloten 2018-05-18 08:19:13 +00:00
Log in om deel te nemen aan deze discussie.
Geen Branch/Tag gespecificeerd
Branches Labels
Labels
Geen items
Geen label
Mijlpaal
Geen items
Geen mijlpaal
Toegewezen aan
Verwijder toegewezen aan
jshaver coolaj86
Niet toegewezen
2 deelnemers
Notificaties
Vervaldatum
Geen vervaldatum ingesteld.
Afhankelijkheden

Geen afhankelijkheden ingesteld.

Referentie: coolaj86/greenlock.js-ARCHIVED#4
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?