coolaj86
/
human-readable-ids.js
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 2 Pull Requests 1 Releases Wiki Activity
Labels Milestones
New Issue

Remove abusive "stupid" word from adjectives list #2

Open
by Ghost opened 4 years ago · 4 comments
Ghost commented 4 years ago

We use this to generate default file names for out clients, so its may be abusive to call file like stupid monkey
I even try to make a pull request but this bad parody of github won't working like original. See my commit by this link
aa3f208ed8

We use this to generate default file names for out clients, so its may be abusive to call file like stupid monkey I even try to make a pull request but this bad parody of github won't working like original. See my commit by this link https://git.coolaj86.com/Zulcom/human-readable-ids.js/commit/aa3f208ed867a838c3613778a1fd042df72bb15f
coolaj86 commented 4 years ago
Owner

How about adding a new word to replace it?

How about adding a new word to replace it?
coolaj86 commented 4 years ago
Owner

Also, saying that "stupid" is abusive is kinda like saying that dumb people don't deserve to live.

There are plenty of stupid people, stupid animals, etc and I think that casting a moral judgement on them is probably more abusive than stating a plain fact.

That said, it certainly is viewed by many people as "negative", and I'm not opposed to "replacing it", but that may require a major version bump since others may depend on the word list.

extensible

I think the best approach may be to allow people to device their own lists of words.

Also, saying that "stupid" is abusive is kinda like saying that dumb people don't deserve to live. There are plenty of stupid people, stupid animals, etc and I think that casting a moral judgement on them is probably more abusive than stating a plain fact. That said, it certainly is viewed by many people as "negative", and I'm not opposed to "replacing it", but that may require a major version bump since others may depend on the word list. # extensible I think the best approach may be to allow people to device their own lists of words.
Ghost commented 4 years ago

How about adding a new word to replace it?

For what? Just remove this word

here are plenty of stupid people, stupid animals, etc and I think that casting a moral judgement on them is probably more abusive than stating a plain fact.

why you even need to state this fact? I am not saying add stupid word is a moral judgement, just this word is not a part of business ethics.

that may require a major version bump

Other packages dumps major version all time, this is not a problem. isn't it?

extensible

full agree

> How about adding a new word to replace it? For what? Just remove this word > here are plenty of stupid people, stupid animals, etc and I think that casting a moral judgement on them is probably more abusive than stating a plain fact. why you even need to state this fact? I am not saying add `stupid` word is a moral judgement, just this word is not a part of business ethics. > that may require a major version bump Other packages dumps major version all time, this is not a problem. isn't it? > extensible full agree
coolaj86 commented 4 years ago
Owner

For what? Just remove this word

To keep the bit-entropy identical

> For what? Just remove this word To keep the bit-entropy identical
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
master
Labels
Apply labels
Clear labels
No items
No Label
Milestone
Set milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No Milestone
Assignees
Assign users
Clear assignees
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

This issue currently doesn't have any dependencies.

Write Preview
Loading…
Cancel
Save
There is no content yet.
Delete Branch '%!s(MISSING)'

Deleting a branch is permanent. It CANNOT be undone. Continue?

No
Yes