Remove abusive "stupid" word from adjectives list #2

Nowe zgłoszenie

Ghost · 2020-02-11T10:54:23Z

Ghost skomentował(-a)

2020-02-11 10:54:23 +00:00

We use this to generate default file names for out clients, so its may be abusive to call file like stupid monkey
I even try to make a pull request but this bad parody of github won't working like original. See my commit by this link
aa3f208ed8

We use this to generate default file names for out clients, so its may be abusive to call file like stupid monkey I even try to make a pull request but this bad parody of github won't working like original. See my commit by this link https://git.coolaj86.com/Zulcom/human-readable-ids.js/commit/aa3f208ed867a838c3613778a1fd042df72bb15f

coolaj86 skomentował(-a)

2020-02-20 20:16:55 +00:00

Właściciel

How about adding a new word to replace it?

coolaj86 skomentował(-a)

2020-02-20 20:21:19 +00:00

Właściciel

Also, saying that "stupid" is abusive is kinda like saying that dumb people don't deserve to live.

There are plenty of stupid people, stupid animals, etc and I think that casting a moral judgement on them is probably more abusive than stating a plain fact.

That said, it certainly is viewed by many people as "negative", and I'm not opposed to "replacing it", but that may require a major version bump since others may depend on the word list.

extensible

I think the best approach may be to allow people to device their own lists of words.

Also, saying that "stupid" is abusive is kinda like saying that dumb people don't deserve to live. There are plenty of stupid people, stupid animals, etc and I think that casting a moral judgement on them is probably more abusive than stating a plain fact. That said, it certainly is viewed by many people as "negative", and I'm not opposed to "replacing it", but that may require a major version bump since others may depend on the word list. # extensible I think the best approach may be to allow people to device their own lists of words.

Ghost skomentował(-a)

2020-02-21 20:02:20 +00:00

How about adding a new word to replace it?

For what? Just remove this word

here are plenty of stupid people, stupid animals, etc and I think that casting a moral judgement on them is probably more abusive than stating a plain fact.

why you even need to state this fact? I am not saying add stupid word is a moral judgement, just this word is not a part of business ethics.

that may require a major version bump

Other packages dumps major version all time, this is not a problem. isn't it?

extensible

full agree

> How about adding a new word to replace it? For what? Just remove this word > here are plenty of stupid people, stupid animals, etc and I think that casting a moral judgement on them is probably more abusive than stating a plain fact. why you even need to state this fact? I am not saying add `stupid` word is a moral judgement, just this word is not a part of business ethics. > that may require a major version bump Other packages dumps major version all time, this is not a problem. isn't it? > extensible full agree

coolaj86 skomentował(-a)

2020-02-21 20:04:33 +00:00

Właściciel

For what? Just remove this word

To keep the bit-entropy identical

> For what? Just remove this word To keep the bit-entropy identical

Zaloguj się, aby dołączyć do tej rozmowy.

Brak etykiety

Brak kamienia milowego

Brak przypisanych

Uczestnicy 2

Powiadomienia

Termin realizacji

Data realizacji jest niewłaściwa lub spoza zakresu. Użyj formatu 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

Brak ustawionego terminu realizacji.

Zależności

No dependencies set.

Reference: coolaj86/human-readable-ids.js#2