We use this to generate default file names for out clients, so its may be abusive to call file like stupid monkey
I even try to make a pull request but this bad parody of github won't working like original. See my commit by this link aa3f208ed8
We use this to generate default file names for out clients, so its may be abusive to call file like stupid monkey
I even try to make a pull request but this bad parody of github won't working like original. See my commit by this link
https://git.coolaj86.com/Zulcom/human-readable-ids.js/commit/aa3f208ed867a838c3613778a1fd042df72bb15f
Also, saying that "stupid" is abusive is kinda like saying that dumb people don't deserve to live.
There are plenty of stupid people, stupid animals, etc and I think that casting a moral judgement on them is probably more abusive than stating a plain fact.
That said, it certainly is viewed by many people as "negative", and I'm not opposed to "replacing it", but that may require a major version bump since others may depend on the word list.
extensible
I think the best approach may be to allow people to device their own lists of words.
Also, saying that "stupid" is abusive is kinda like saying that dumb people don't deserve to live.
There are plenty of stupid people, stupid animals, etc and I think that casting a moral judgement on them is probably more abusive than stating a plain fact.
That said, it certainly is viewed by many people as "negative", and I'm not opposed to "replacing it", but that may require a major version bump since others may depend on the word list.
# extensible
I think the best approach may be to allow people to device their own lists of words.
here are plenty of stupid people, stupid animals, etc and I think that casting a moral judgement on them is probably more abusive than stating a plain fact.
why you even need to state this fact? I am not saying add stupid word is a moral judgement, just this word is not a part of business ethics.
that may require a major version bump
Other packages dumps major version all time, this is not a problem. isn't it?
extensible
full agree
> How about adding a new word to replace it?
For what? Just remove this word
> here are plenty of stupid people, stupid animals, etc and I think that casting a moral judgement on them is probably more abusive than stating a plain fact.
why you even need to state this fact? I am not saying add `stupid` word is a moral judgement, just this word is not a part of business ethics.
> that may require a major version bump
Other packages dumps major version all time, this is not a problem. isn't it?
> extensible
full agree
We use this to generate default file names for out clients, so its may be abusive to call file like stupid monkey
I even try to make a pull request but this bad parody of github won't working like original. See my commit by this link
aa3f208ed8How about adding a new word to replace it?
Also, saying that "stupid" is abusive is kinda like saying that dumb people don't deserve to live.
There are plenty of stupid people, stupid animals, etc and I think that casting a moral judgement on them is probably more abusive than stating a plain fact.
That said, it certainly is viewed by many people as "negative", and I'm not opposed to "replacing it", but that may require a major version bump since others may depend on the word list.
extensible
I think the best approach may be to allow people to device their own lists of words.
For what? Just remove this word
why you even need to state this fact? I am not saying add
stupidword is a moral judgement, just this word is not a part of business ethics.Other packages dumps major version all time, this is not a problem. isn't it?
full agree
To keep the bit-entropy identical