added some routes to save and retrieve JWKs

This commit is contained in:
tigerbot 2017-06-28 14:28:28 -06:00
parent e92b5f3e3e
commit d320f3d990
3 changed files with 113 additions and 0 deletions

13
models.js Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
'use strict';
var apiname = 'issuer_oauth3_org';
var baseFields = [ 'createdAt', 'updatedAt', 'deletedAt' ];
module.exports = [
{
tablename: apiname + '_jwks',
idname: 'id',
unique: ['id'],
indices: baseFields.concat([ 'kty', 'kid' ]),
}
];

16
package.json Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
{
"name": "issuer_oauth3.org",
"version": "1.0.0-placeholder",
"description": "Implementation of server-side RESTful OAuth3 issuer APIs",
"main": "rest.js",
"scripts": {
"test": "echo \"Error: no test specified\" && exit 1"
},
"repository": {
"type": "git",
"url": "git+https://git.daplie.com/Oauth3/issuer_oauth3.org.git"
},
"dependencies": {
"bluebird": "^3.5.0"
}
}

84
rest.js Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
'use strict';
var PromiseA = require('bluebird');
var crypto = require('crypto');
module.exports.create = function (bigconf, deps, app) {
var Jwks = { restful: {} };
function attachModels(req, res, next) {
return req.getSiteStore().then(function (models) {
req.Models = models;
next();
});
}
Jwks.thumbprint = function (jwk) {
// To produce a thumbprint we need to create a JSON string with only the required keys for
// the key type, with the keys sorted lexicographically and no white space. We then need
// run it through a SHA-256 and encode the result in url safe base64.
// https://stackoverflow.com/questions/42588786/how-to-fingerprint-a-jwk
var keys;
if (jwk.kty === 'EC') {
keys = ['crv', 'x', 'y'];
} else if (jwk.kty === 'RSA') {
keys = ['e', 'n'];
} else {
return PromiseA.reject(new Error('invalid JWK key type ' + jwk.kty));
}
keys.push('kty');
keys.sort();
var missing = keys.filter(function (name) { return !jwk.hasOwnProperty(name); });
if (missing.length > 0) {
return PromiseA.reject(new Error('JWK of type '+jwk.kty+' missing fields ' + missing));
}
// I'm not 100% sure this behavior is guaranteed by a real standard, but when we use an array
// as the replacer argument the keys are always in the order they appeared in the array.
var jwkStr = JSON.stringify(jwk, keys);
var hash = crypto.createHash('sha256').update(jwkStr).digest('base64');
return PromiseA.resolve(hash.replace(/\+/g, '-').replace(/\//g, '_').replace(/=+/g, ''));
};
Jwks.restful.get = function (req, res) {
var promise = req.Models.IssuerOauth3OrgJwks.find({ kid: req.params.kid }, { limit: 1 }).then(function (jwkArr) {
var jwk = jwkArr[0];
// We need to sanitize the key to make sure we don't deliver any private keys fields if
// we were given a key we could use to sign tokens on behalf of the user.
var whitelist = [ 'kty', 'alg', 'kid', 'use' ];
if (jwk.kty === 'EC') {
whitelist = whitelist.concat([ 'crv', 'x', 'y' ]);
} else if (jwk.kty === 'RSA') {
whitelist = whitelist.concat([ 'e', 'n' ]);
}
var result = {};
whitelist.forEach(function (key) {
result[key] = jwk[key];
});
return result;
});
app.handlePromise(req, res, promise, "[issuer@oauth3.org] retrieve JWK");
};
Jwks.restful.saveNew = function (req, res) {
var jwk = req.body;
var promise = Jwks.thumbprint(jwk).then(function (kid) {
if (jwk.kid && jwk.kid !== kid) {
throw new Error('provided kid "'+jwk.kid+'" does not match calculated "'+kid+'"');
}
jwk.kid = kid;
return req.Models.IssuerOauth3OrgJwks.upsert(req.params.sub, jwk);
}).then(function () {
return { success: true };
});
app.handlePromise(req, res, promise, "[issuer@oauth3.org] create JWK");
};
app.use( '/jwks', attachModels);
app.get( '/jwks/:kid.json', Jwks.restful.get);
app.post( '/jwks/:sub', Jwks.restful.saveNew);
};