@coolaj86 thoughts? if you like it I can add documentation to readme. Also this paints the path for allowing verbs etc. Also I'm not hard sold on choices of a, n, and #.
@coolaj86 thoughts? if you like it I can add documentation to readme. Also this paints the path for allowing verbs etc. Also I'm not hard sold on choices of `a`, `n`, and `#`.
Another approach here could be that the format for .get() is something like this:
.get("num-adj-anim-verb") where separator is required as [-_ ] and can be overriden by the caller. First step is to regex-split by the separator then compare non-single character strings.
Another approach here could be that the format for `.get()` is something like this:
`.get("num-adj-anim-verb")` where separator is required as `[-_ ]` and can be overriden by the caller. First step is to regex-split by the separator then compare non-single character strings.
Bump. Thoughts?
I also thought of allowing the number to be dynamic. Sticking with the long-string identification this could be done as:
`.get("#-anim")` - 9 pandas
`.get("##-anim")` - 42 fish
`.get("###-anim")` - 101 dalmatians
Just pinging you to let you know I've got this on my todo list. I'm swamped this week. I'll try to take a look by Saturday.
(also, I didn't see the notification last week)
Just pinging you to let you know I've got this on my todo list. I'm swamped this week. I'll try to take a look by Saturday.
(also, I didn't see the notification last week)
This pull request is broken due to missing fork information.
@coolaj86 thoughts? if you like it I can add documentation to readme. Also this paints the path for allowing verbs etc. Also I'm not hard sold on choices of
a,n, and#.Sounds good to me so far, and it doesn't add much code. Sure, keep going with it.
@coolaj86 This is ready for review. Let me know if you want anything changed
Another approach here could be that the format for
.get()is something like this:.get("num-adj-anim-verb")where separator is required as[-_ ]and can be overriden by the caller. First step is to regex-split by the separator then compare non-single character strings.Bump. Thoughts?
I also thought of allowing the number to be dynamic. Sticking with the long-string identification this could be done as:
.get("#-anim")- 9 pandas.get("##-anim")- 42 fish.get("###-anim")- 101 dalmatiansJust pinging you to let you know I've got this on my todo list. I'm swamped this week. I'll try to take a look by Saturday.
(also, I didn't see the notification last week)